Welkom op de Wiki van de Nederlandse Piratenpartij. Deze wiki is voortdurend in ontwikkeling en probeert een centrale functie binnen de partij te vervullen. Wil je een bijdrage leveren aan de ontwikkeling? Maak dan een account aan en ga aan de slag!
Voor een overzicht van de meest noodzakelijke taken zie de to do list.
Mocht je vragen, suggesties of interessante websites hebben dan kun je contact opnemen met Azonata (wiki@piratenpartij.nl). Alvast hartelijk bedankt.
Verschillen
Dit geeft de verschillen weer tussen de geselecteerde revisie en de huidige revisie van de pagina.
|
publicaties:edri_blocking_booklet [2012/07/18 14:56] Azonata fix |
publicaties:edri_blocking_booklet [2012/07/18 15:05] (huidige) Azonata fix |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regel 100: | Regel 100: | ||
| ===== Blocking by self-regulation – the beginning of the end of the open Internet ===== | ===== Blocking by self-regulation – the beginning of the end of the open Internet ===== | ||
| The European Commission’s proposal was amended before publication in order to ensure that blocking via “self regulation” would be possible. This “self-regulatory” approach is part of a much wider strategy of using Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to police the Internet, in a less predictable, less democratic and more pervasive way than regulation undertaken by the state. Some current initiatives include: | The European Commission’s proposal was amended before publication in order to ensure that blocking via “self regulation” would be possible. This “self-regulatory” approach is part of a much wider strategy of using Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to police the Internet, in a less predictable, less democratic and more pervasive way than regulation undertaken by the state. Some current initiatives include: | ||
| - | * The draft Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) suggests limiting ISP legal protection from liability unless unspecified policing “policies” are put in place by ISPs.(([[ http://blog.die-linke.de/digitalelinke/wp-content/uploads/674b-09.pdf|EUROPEAN UNION'S COMMENTS TO THE | + | * The draft Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) suggests limiting ISP legal protection from liability unless unspecified policing “policies” are put in place by ISPs.(([[http://blog.die-linke.de/digitalelinke/wp-content/uploads/674b-09.pdf|EUROPEAN UNION'S COMMENTS TO THE US PROPOSAL - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTSRELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT - (29 oktober 2009).]])) |
| - | US PROPOSAL - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTSRELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT - (29 oktober 2009).]])) | + | |
| * The Council of the European Union in its resolution on IPR enforcement calls for “the Commission, the Member States and the relevant stakeholders to pursue ongoing dialogues and to resolutely seek agreements on voluntary practical measures.”(([[http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/113098.pdf|Council Resolution of 1 March 2010 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the internal market.]])) | * The Council of the European Union in its resolution on IPR enforcement calls for “the Commission, the Member States and the relevant stakeholders to pursue ongoing dialogues and to resolutely seek agreements on voluntary practical measures.”(([[http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/113098.pdf|Council Resolution of 1 March 2010 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the internal market.]])) | ||
| * Discussions on Internet blocking among the Member States are reportedly leaning towards “self-regulatory” measures rather than them having a legal basis, as required by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. | * Discussions on Internet blocking among the Member States are reportedly leaning towards “self-regulatory” measures rather than them having a legal basis, as required by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. | ||
