Consolidated Text - Prepared for Public Release
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
PUBLIC Predecisional/Deliberative Draft: April 2010
This draft text does not identify participants’ positions in respect of square bracketed options.
Nothing in this Agreement shall derogate from any international obligation of a Party with respect to any other Party under existing agreements to which both Parties are party.
A suitable provision needs to be drafted that would ensure nothing in the Agreement detracts from national legislation regarding protection of personal privacy. In the same way, a suitable provision needs to be drafted regarding disclosure of commercial information
For purposes of this Agreement, unless otherwise specified:
In the context of this section, e} {E}ach Party shall make available to right holders {civil judicial} {or administrative} procedures concerning the enforcement of any {intellectual property right} {copyrights and related rights and trademarks}.
{Without prejudice to other statutory provisions which, in particular, govern the protection of confidentiality of information sources or the processing of personal data,} 17) Each Party shall provide that in civil judicial proceedings concerning the enforcement of {intellectual property rights}{copyright or related rights and trademarks}, its judicial authorities shall have the authority upon a justified request of the right holder, to order the {alleged} infringer {including an alleged infringer} to provide, {for the purpose of collecting evidence} any {relevant} information {information on the origin and distribution network of the infringing goods or services}{in the form as prescribed in its applicable laws and regulations} that the infringer possesses or controls, {where appropriate,} to the right holder or to the judicial authorities. Such information may include information regarding any person or persons involved in any aspect of the infringement and regarding the means of production or distribution channel of such goods or services, including the identification of third persons involved in the production and distribution of the infringing goods or services or in their channels of distribution. {For greater clarity, this provision does not apply to the extent that it would conflict with common law or statutory privileges, such as legal professional privilege.}}
{X. Each Party shall provide that its judicial authorities shall have the authority, at the request of the applicant, to issue an interlocutory injunction intended to prevent any imminent infringement of an intellectual property right {copyright or related rights or trademark}. An interlocutory injunction may also be issued, under the same conditions, against an {infringing} intermediary whose services are being used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right. Each Party shall also provide that provisional measures may be issued, even before the commencement of proceedings on the merits, to preserve relevant evidence in respect of the alleged infringement. Such measures may include inter alia the detailed description, the taking of samples or the physical seizure of documents or of the infringing goods.}
Parties may exclude from the application of this Section small quantities of goods of a non-commercial nature contained in travelers’ personal luggage {or sent in small consignments.}
Each Party shall permit the competent authorities to request a right holder to supply relevant information to assist the competent authorities in taking border measures provided for under this Section. Each Party may also allow a right holder to supply relevant information to the competent authorities.
1. Each Party shall provide procedures for import {and in-transit 23) and suspected pirated copyright goods 24) {goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right}into free circulation.
{As an alternative to procedures in Article 2.6.1 and 2.7.1 relating to export or in-transit shipments, each Party shall provide that where shipments are exported from that Party, or shipments are in-transit through that Party, it shall cooperate to provide all available information to the destination Party, upon request of the destination Party, to enable effective enforcement against shipments of infringing 26) goods.}
Each Party shall provide that its competent authorities shall have the authority to require a right holder requesting procedures described under Article 2.6 to provide a reasonable security or equivalent assurance sufficient to protect the defendant and the competent authorities and to prevent abuse. Each Party shall provide that such security or equivalent assurance shall not unreasonably deter recourse to these procedures. Each Party may provide that such security may be in the form of a bond conditioned to hold the defendant harmless from any loss or damage resulting from any suspension of the release of the goods in the event the competent authorities determine that the good {is not a counterfeit trademark good or a pirated copyright good} {does not infringe intellectual property rights covered by this section}. Only in exceptional circumstances {or pursuant to a judicial order} may a Party permit a defendant to post a bond or other security to obtain possession of suspected counterfeit trademark goods or suspected pirated copyright goods.
Each Party shall adopt or maintain a procedure by which competent authorities may determine, within a reasonable period of time after the initiation of the procedures described under Article 2.X or 2.X, whether the suspected infringing goods infringe an intellectual property right 27).
ARTICLE 2.13: DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION Without prejudice to a Party’s laws pertaining to the privacy or confidentiality of information:
Each Party shall provide that its competent authorities may act upon their own initiative to initiate investigation {or} {and/or} legal action with respect to the {criminal} offenses described in {Article 2.14} {Sections 3 and 4.} {at least in cases of significant public interest, in accordance with national law.}
Each Party shall ensure that the rights of the {defendants and} third parties shall be duly protected and guaranteed.} 42)
when, in cases of subparagraphs (ii) and (iii)51), the provider does not have actual knowledge of the infringement and is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; and }
{Each Party recognizes that some persons 52) use the services of third parties, including online service providers,{53)} for engaging in intellectual property rights infringements.
when exercising the activities as stipulated in paragraph 3(a)(ii) and/or (iii) the online service providers act {takes appropriate measures} expeditiously, in accordance with applicable law {s}, {such as those} to remove or disable access to infringing material or infringing activity upon obtaining actual knowledge of the infringement {or the fact that the information at the initial source has been removed or disabled.} {or having reasonable grounds to know that the infringement is occurring}}
except that the provisions of (ii) shall not be applied to the extent that the online service provider is acting solely as a conduit for transmissions through its system or network.}
{Paragraph 3(a) shall not affect the possibility for a judicial or administrative authority, in accordance with the Parties legal system, requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement, nor does it affect the possibility of the parties establishing procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to information
The Parties shall not impose a general monitoring requirement on providers when acting in accordance with this paragraph 3.}
{3 ter. Each Party shall enable right holders, who have given effective notification to an online service provider of materials that they claim with valid reasons to be infringing their copyright or related rights, to expeditiously obtain from that provider information on the identity of the relevant subscriber.
3 quater. Each Party shall promote the development of mutually supportive relationships between online service providers and right holders to deal effectively with patent, industrial design, trademark and copyright or related rights infringement which takes place by means of the Internet, including the encouragement of establishing guidelines for the actions which should be taken.}
{Each Party shall provide for adequate legal protection 61) and effective legal remedies, in the form of civil remedies or criminal penalties in appropriate cases of willful conduct, against the circumvention of effective technological measures that are used by authors, performers or producers or phonograms in connection with the exercise of their rights and that restrict unauthorized acts in respect of their works, performances, and phonogram. These shall apply to:}
{Further, {each Party may adopt exceptions and limitations to measures implementing paragraph 4 so long as they do not significantly impair the adequacy of legal protection of those measures or the effectiveness of legal remedies for violations of those measures.} 65)
{E}ach Party shall provide for civil remedies, {or} {as well as} criminal penalties} in appropriate cases of willful {66)} conduct, that apply to any person performing {without authority} any of the following acts knowing {or with respect to civil remedies having reasonable grounds to know} that it will induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement of any copyright or related right:
{7.} {6.2} Each Party may adopt {limitations or} exceptions to the requirements of subparagraphs (a) and (b) {of paragraph (6)} {so long as they do not significantly impair the adequacy of legal protection or effectiveness of legal remedies for violations of those measures.}